Am i gay masterdoc
Lesbian feminists saw giving in to men in any way as allowing oneself to be subordinated by male societal power. For lesbian feminists, the only true way to be a feminist was also to be a lesbian. In doing this, lesbian feminists wanted to cut men out from all parts of life, including sex. The movement, called “lesbian feminism”, outlined a type of feminism where women directed all their attention and love towards other women. In the 1970s, gay feminists who were tired of being left out of both the feminist movement (because of their queerness) and the liberation movement (because of their femaleness), created a new movement. For most people that is undeniable, but does it have to be the only way we understand attraction? Lesbian Feminism It is an uncontrollable draw towards another person that does not consciously move from mind to body. Attraction often rises from an unknown place. The concept that queerness could be a choice has not received any attention, and it has instead been associated with conservatism, and therefore homophobia.Īnd surely there is a lot to the idea that one can’t choose who they are attracted to. Because it is more common for gay men to believe that queerness is innate, that narrative has taken center stage. However, since gay men have more power in society than gay women, they have control over the narrative surrounding queerness. This is because in heterosexual relationships women are already in a subordinate position, in addition to their subordinate position within society. Ward argues that women are giving up less power by being gay because they didn’t have as much power to lose. Gay women, on the other hand, are already in a subordinate position. However, this implies that if given the choice, gay men wouldn’t have wanted to be gay. Because of this, gay men are often behind the idea that they couldn’t have chosen to be straight. Ward says that “gay men are keenly aware that if they were straight, they would have more power”. Ward replies that “gay men actually have something to lose, or certainly they have more to lose as the result of being gay”. Mckeever asks Ward why it is more prevalent for gay men to be a part of the narrative that queerness is set from birth. In one particular segment, Ward discusses the ideas behind whether or not gayness is innate or chosen. The book investigates the sexist, and white supremacist roots that take hold in heterosexual relationships and the history of heterosexuality. This destruction takes many forms the destruction of one’s relationship to one’s family, the destruction of one’s friendships or social status, etc. In these stories, gay love must remain hidden because there is a constant threat that if revealed, destruction would ensue. In most media, specific movies about gay relationships, the queerness portrayed is painful and seeped with repression. The “tragedy” that Ward is referring to is not hard to find. The title, The Tragedy of Heterosexuality, plays with the tragic lens that media portrays homosexual relationships. In the book, Ward flips around the typical narrative and discusses the essential flaws of heterosexuality. In an episode of James Mckeever’s podcast, Sociologists Talking Real Sh*t, his guest, Professor Jane Ward, talks about her new book, The Tragedy of Heterosexuality. Instead, being queer has been physically sealed from the start.
Being “Born this way,” implies that queer people are unable to choose.
Alternatively, many gay people, specifically gay men, push the “Born this Way” concept. Often from the conservative side, a lack of genetic backup for queerness means that people are choosing sin, or not fighting hard enough to be heterosexual. Legitimized or not, the results of these experiments often become political tools to serve one group or another’s beliefs on queerness. The biological “legitimacy” of homosexual attraction in a is often at its center. Discovering the ins and outs of attraction has been on researchers’ minds for centuries. Is being gay a choice? Countless times people have asked and researched that question.